[Molecularmechanics] first steps
Konrad Hinsen
molecularmechanics@tddft.org
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:04:52 +0200
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 15:31, David van der Spoel wrote:
> I wouldn't want to give up on XMLized force fields yet. The problems
> Konrad describes in Amber are due to an interweaving of code and data,
> i.e. part of the information is in the algorithm. It may be hard to
> disentangle those in a specific case like Amber, but this is exactly the
> reason why we started to think about this in Gromacs. We do have some
The same problem exists in CHARMM and as far as I can tell in GROMOS. It can
of course be overcome by a redefinition of the force fields (which would
still be physically equivalent of course). If we can get the developers of
the main force fields to work on this, I am all for it. I just don't want to
wait for this to happen before starting to work on a common structure
representation, which would be useful in itself even without a unified force
field description.
> which makes implementing other FFs a pain. As soon as you have the
> complete description of the force field in XML however, the largest
> problem is solved.
Sure, but I expect this to be quite difficult to achieve.
Konrad.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen | E-Mail: hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr
Centre de Biophysique Moleculaire (CNRS) | Tel.: +33-2.38.25.56.24
Rue Charles Sadron | Fax: +33-2.38.63.15.17
45071 Orleans Cedex 2 | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/
France | Nederlands/Francais
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------